Amidst all the increasingly tedious wailing and gnashing of teeth that
has accompanied the so-far almost eight years of European failure in
major championships since Scotland's Paul Lawrie did
Photo: ©David Cannon/Allsport |
Sandy Lyle is the only European to win the Players at that was 20 years ago. |
|
the business at Carnoustie back in 1999, another aspect of golf at the (almost) highest level has gone relatively unnoticed. With the notable exception of
Sandy Lyle two decades ago, men from the old world haven't been winning
The Players Championship, what some of the more uninformed and deluded
amongst us like to refer to as the game's 'fifth major,' either.
Oh, there have been the occasional close-run things, most memorably
Colin Montgomerie's brace of runner-up finishes in 1995 and '96, a feat
duplicated by Padraig Harrington in 2003 and 04. Other European
notables like Nick Faldo, Bernhard Langer and, most recently, Henrik
Stenson, have posted top-three finishes over the years, but mostly, the
PGA Tour's flagship event has been dominated by the US Navy, with only
the occasional foreign interloper interrupting the home fleet's almost
perennial success.
Indeed, the first 13 editions of what started as the Tournament
Players Championship, morphed into The Players Championship and is now
apparently just The Players, were won by nephews of Uncle Sam, since
when four Antipodeans - Steve Elkington, Greg Norman, Craig Perks and
Adam Scott - have joined Zimbabwe's Nick Price and this week's
defending champion Stephen Ames of Trinidad & Tobago as overseas
winners of golf's fifth most important event.
| Best European Tour finishes at the Players: |
|
| Year |
Player |
Finish / Strokes back of winner |
|---|
| 1987 |
Sandy Lyle |
Winner / in playoff |
| 1992 |
Nick Faldo |
T2nd / 4 back |
| 1993 |
Bernhard Langer |
2nd / 5 back |
| 1995 |
Bernhard Langer |
2nd / 1 back |
| 1996 |
Colin Montgomerie |
T2nd / 4 back |
| 2003 |
Padraig Harrington |
T2nd / 6 back |
| 2004 |
Padraig Harrington |
2nd / 1 back |
But, post-Sandy, no more Europeans. Not one. None. Zero. Nada. Zip.
Nothing. A Scot winning the US Amateur Championship is seemingly more
likely. Oh. . .
Even when the very best Europeans were the very best players in the
world back in the 1980s and early 1990s, the rest of the so-called
'Big-Five' weren't getting the job done around what was then viewed as
Pete Dye's demonic creation. Not Seve Ballesteros. Not Ian Woosnam. Not
Langer. And not Faldo.
At least in Faldo's case, lack of real interest was definitely a
factor. At a time when the lanky Englishman was the man to beat in
almost every Grand Slam event, your correspondent came across the
six-time major champion on the 16th tee in the final round of a Players
Championship. As I recall, Faldo was on the edge of contention but was
unlikely to win, even if the water-strewn final holes at the TPC of
Sawgrass did happen to throw up one of the many wild and wacky swings
seen there over the years. But he was up there somewhere.
 Photo: © David Cannon /Allsport | | Nick Faldo played in 21 Players and finished in the Top-ten twice, T2nd in 1992 and 5th in 1994. |
|
Anyway, the point of the story is this: in the last round of what was
already one of the game's biggest and most prestigious events, the
world's best player was working on his method. Driving from that 16th
tee, Faldo pointedly kept his left heel off the ground at address. He
was performing a swing drill rather than focusing on the job at hand!
That the Masters Tournament was taking place two weeks later was no
coincidence, of course. Notoriously, Faldo cared only for golf's four
biggest events and little for anything else. As far as he was
concerned, number five might as well have been number 1,000. For Faldo,
the Players represented simply a warm-up event for something bigger.
For the rest, other factors have come into play, at least in the
Player's early days. The course, for example. Until its latest
makeover, Sawgrass has been the quintessential American venue. Long
rough bordered the fairways and greens. Water hazards were and are
seemingly everywhere. The greens were ultra-fast. In other words,
conditions all but impossible to reproduce exactly across the Atlantic,
especially if you throw in a bit of humidity. Europe just isn't like
Florida.
Still, in recent times such a foreign environment shouldn't have been
quite so foreign to the foreign contingent from Europe. With more and
more of them spending more and more of their time salivating over the
ridiculously rich PGA Tour pickings available since the coming of
Tiger, Europe's best are surely becoming more and more familiar with
what is known across the pond as 'American golf,' as if no other types
of courses exist in the US. So not feeling at home is no longer a valid
reason for failure.
Nor is the fact that, until this year, the Players has been played in
March. Yes, the 'too early in the season for us' excuse had some merit
back in the 1980s, but it is no longer valid. Like their US
counterparts, the best Europeans now play a global schedule that lasts
almost 12 months of every year.
 Photo: © Stan Badz/WireImage | | The 17th hole with all of the people around it can be a scary experience for a player. |
|
Then again, now that I come to think of it, maybe the Europeans do
have a problem taking seriously at least one aspect of the Sawgrass
course. If, like me, they see the island green at the penultimate hole
as nothing more than a mindless contrivance that has no place in any
event claiming to be anything other than a circus, then perhaps they
have a similarly hard time rating the whole week as anything other than
just another opportunity to trouser a large check. After all, another
tournnament just like it will be along next week.
So, if the Players is ever to attain its much-coveted major status,
one of the things that must change is the 17th hole. As my Aussie
friend, former European Tour player and now successful course architect
Mike Clayton says, "It's American golf (there's that phrase again).
It's entertainment. The fans want to see a car wreck and that's what it
is. (Fellow course architect) Tom Doak called it 'the germ that started
the plague.' It's been copied too often, fortunately not in Australia,
but mainly in Asia, where they think that everything American is great."
 Photo: © Richard Heathcote/Getty Images | | Tiger Woods hitting his 2nd shot into 18 with the new clubhouse in the background. |
|
This year - apart from the much-changed course and the sparkly-new
clubhouse (how do you spell 'gaudy' and 'tasteless?') - the Players is
going to be different in at least one other aspect. The foreign press
contingent, especially that from the United Kingdom, is going to be
much depleted. Deprived of the opportunity to work on Masters-preview
pieces, the British journos are staying away in droves. Only three are
making the trip to Sawgrass.
Now, this may seem trivial, but it has implications in two important
areas. In the early days of the Masters - long before it was recognized
as a major - Bobby Jones and Clifford Roberts made a point of inviting
the leading British pressmen, Henry Longhurst, Pat Ward-Thomas, Leonard
Crawley, to Augusta on an annual basis. Consciously or not, they knew
that international coverage of their 'toonamint' was vital if it was to
transcend its rivals and become one of the most important stops on the
schedule.
Television is also important in that respect. The Masters has always
been shown on the BBC, on a channel open and free to all. This year,
the Players will only be available in Britain on something called
Setanta Sports, a fledgling fee-paying satellite channel with, as yet,
only a miniscule audience. No one will be watching - or, by extension,
caring.
For the Players and PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem not to be
learning the lessons of history seems strange. Finchem's apparent
indifference only adds to the 'just another big money event' impression
that will make the tournament less important outside the confines of
the US and, in turn, contribute to the death of any major aspirations.
Secondly - and this may be overestimating the effect of the media
more than a little - lack of coverage at home may subconsciously affect
the extent to which the European players yearn for a Players win. If no
one else sees it as worth making an effort for, why should they?
The mind goes back to dear old Sandy in the immediate aftermath of his
victory in '87. Asked what the difference was between this latest win
and his Open Championship triumph two years earlier at Royal St.
Georges, the guileless and loveable Scot replied, "oh, about 125 years."
So there you have it. Europeans can't be bothered winning the Players
because they really don't think it's that big a deal. Sorry, Tim.